Notable Cases

ST. LOUIS DWI & CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER

Mr. Brengle has been responsible for multiple “Not Guilty” verdicts and the outright dismissal of all felony charges in dozens of cases—too many to list every one. Of course, The Brengle Law Firm, LLC cannot guarantee any particular result, however, Mr. Brengle can guarantee that when an accused citizen chooses The Brengle Law Firm for their defense, they will hire an attorney who has a track record of success built on hard work and a deep concern for his clients. Please take a some time to read below about several successful outcomes.

St. v. N.S.

N.S. was an O'Fallon resident facing his second DWI arrest. The police officer claimed that N.S. failed field sobriety tests. The police officer obtained a warrant to draw the blood of N.S., and the test results showed a blood alcohol content of .12 and .10. ---CASE DISMISSED.

St. v. J.G.

J.G., a Troy resident, faced his first DWI arrest after leaving a party where most people at the outdoor party were drinking. The police officer claimed J.G. failed field sobriety tests, and at the request of the police officer, J.G. blew into a breathalyzer machine, which gave a BAC of .11.---NOT GUILTY.

St. v. G.T.

After an automobile accident, an Elsberry resident faced his third DWI arrest. The police officer who responded to the accident was a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE), and he arrested G.T., claiming that G.T. was intoxicated with drugs. G.T.was charged with Felony DWI.---CASE DISMISSED.

St. v. J.G.

J.G., a Warrenton resident, was pulled over for speeding outside of Warrenton. The police officer detained J.G. for sometime in hopes of finding a way to search his car. The police officer resorted to techniques declared illegal by the Missouri and the United States Supreme Court, and in doing so tricked J.G. into allowing a search of his car. The search revealed over 50 grams of methamphetamine. J.G. was charged with multiple felony counts related to the manufacturing and selling of methamphetamine. Mr. Brengle filed a Motion to Suppress, and showed the presiding judge that the law required the suppression of all evidence against J.G..---CASE DISMISSED.